Jerry Saltz How to Go to an Art Show

In a moment perhaps better consigned to the mists of television history, Bravo once produced a reality Television show chosen Work of Fine art: The Next Smashing Artist , which had its two seasons in 2010 and 2011. Information technology came between the decline of cablevision and the rise of streaming, when niche shows were only found on channels similar Bravo instead of straight-to-Netflix, where they are now more easily ignored. Work of Art was a visual-fine art version of Project Runway , in which contestants vied to produce the best portraits, collages, and installations instead of dresses. Fourteen artists competed for a prize of $100,000 and an exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum.

HOW TO Exist AN ARTIST by Jerry Saltz

Riverhead Books, 144 pp., $22.00

Contestants ranged from a guy named the Sucklord, who fabricated satirical custom-designed toys, to Judith Braun, an older painter who already had some success in the formal gallery ecosystem. The works produced on consignment—create a piece of Popular fine art, turn part of a Fiat 500 car into a sculpture (become that sponsorship coin)—were mediocre at best. The one memorable part of the bear witness was the participation of Jerry Saltz, New York magazine'due south longtime fine art critic, as a approximate. Saltz, fatherly and charismatically unpretentious, doled out both tough communication and encouragement. His message seemed to be that, with the correct guidance, anyone could brand a piece of fine art worthy of a theoretical museum prove.

Saltz later disavowed Work of Art: "I failed at practicing criticism on TV," he wrote, though he would gladly attempt again. All the same, the show gave him a new visibility not just every bit a magazine critic but a translator of the art world to the public and, to a lesser extent, vice versa. In 2018, he received a Pulitzer Prize for his reviews. Saltz's new book, How to Be an Creative person, his commencement original after previous collections of criticism, follows the principle of the Tv evidence. It gives a series of short instructions or prompts, some banal and others provocative, on both looking at and making fine art, for audiences of any level of art fluency.

The appetite for this kind of advice has only increased in the past decade, as the art world (and marketplace) has become more than visible to the wider public. With social media, we're hyperaware of the kind of daily aesthetic decision-making that was in one case the province of people in the art industry—creating a tasteful image and broadcasting information technology to a set of followers. Now anyone with an iPhone has the tools to create and publish a soft-focus portrait photo or frenetically cut video prune; TikTok posts recall cipher more than than Ryan Trecartin's video art circa 2006. Saltz participates in this culture himself, posting a high volume of paw-scrawled notes and anti-Trump memes on his Facebook folio, which has become a kind of digital salon.

His book evokes this full general aureola of visual literacy and creativity—we're all artists now! Or are we? The problem is that art-making is about much more than just the epitome, and it's never quite possible for anybody.

---

A 144-page volume that deserves the cliche appellation of slim, How to Be an Artist exists at the intersection of a tiny corpus of art-criticism books and the booming genre of self-help-meets-lifestyle-inspiration. The pithy guide format is having a bestselling renaissance, including Marie Kondo's cleaning manuals; Marking Manson's The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck and its diverse follow-ups; and the productivity porn of volumes collecting the morning time routines of various artists and thinkers, every bit if we could write In Search of Lost Time by breakfasting similar Proust. (Eat, Pray, Beloved might be the ancestor of the species.) Like others in its cohort, Saltz's book is visually appealing, with plentiful colour reproductions of artwork and portraits of artists. In the introduction, Saltz describes his goal as leading the reader "from wondering and worrying to making existent art, fifty-fifty cracking art." Then he adjusts expectations: The book tin "at least help you alive life a little more than creatively."

Saltz was a painter before he became a critic. He has cultivated a relatable backstory that he repeats frequently: a stalled art career, a stint as a truck driver, writing his first piece for The Village Voice when he was in his forties. Leaning on the story, Saltz commonly positions himself as a populist. If he can brand a life in fine art, you can, too. The book charts a rough linear progression through the course of a career, from thinking like an creative person, to maintaining a studio routine, to entering and then surviving the art globe. ("Acquire to deal with rejection.") The studio is vital: Whether it'due south a cleared-off kitchen table or white-walled warehouse, it's a personal space in which to experiment, take chances, and create things that don't exist. Saltz embraces the difficult, Bruce Nauman-esque thought that anything that happens in the studio (or the headspace of the studio) should exist considered valid as fine art. You need to look at equally much art as possible, follow your inclinations wherever they go, and be patient.

Interspersed are short exercises or assignments that double as art therapy, like making a "memory tree" that represents your life and showing information technology to someone else who then analyzes information technology; trying to copy the styles of different artists or movements; and making a drawing using but erasure. This final suggestion does non come with an explanation that Robert Rauschenberg once famously asked Willem de Kooning for a cartoon of his and then laboriously erased information technology using whatsoever ways necessary in a 1953 piece that presaged elements of Minimalist art. Though the book presents plenty of threads to follow if the reader wants to go deeper, it doesn't fully connect the activities of the artist with their roots in fine art history or conceptual innovation.

This version of living like an artist evokes something closer to corporatized mindfulness, a heightened attentiveness to the world for the sake of trouble-solving (and maybe renting a loft). Art hither suggests self-discovery and self-expression without risk; creativity means things you can Instagram. Throughout the book, Saltz presents an uneven mix of pat statements on the nature of fine art, overenthusiastic self-help ("your talent is like a wild brute that must be fed"), and a handful of hard-earned critical insights. Aphoristic quotes are sprinkled in from the likes of Albert Einstein, Jay-Z, and Louise Bourgeois likewise as Saltz's famous-creative person friends and his wife, the legendary New York Times art critic Roberta Smith. (Smith's contributions are amid the more intellectually grounded: "Artists do not own the pregnant of their piece of work.")

The book is meliorate as a guide to looking at and cultivating your ain taste in fine art than actually making it. There are helpful musings on form versus content—"Style is the unstable essence an creative person brings to a genre"—and the challenge of engaging with contemporary art without dismissing it out of hand: "Don't think adept or bad. Think useful, pleasurable, strange, lucky." There are flashes of Saltz the breezy critic, drawing on lifelong knowledge to sketch an artist'southward work in a few evocative words: "Matisse's thought of composition and space is similar a wildflower garden, a long gaze at the night sky, a changing cloud." The best parts of this book could have appeared under the title How to Exist an Art Critic, just that lifestyle is much less aspirational.

---

Other statements in Saltz's guide might exit the reader dislocated or depressed. "Art isn't about playing games with aesthetics," Saltz writes. Isn't that exactly what it is? It depends on what you mean by aesthetics, which he never quite defines. "Accept that y'all'll probable exist poor." It is indeed hard to brand coin by selling artwork through traditional galleries, merely an credence of poverty shouldn't be function of anyone'due south working life, permit alone the default status of an artist (or writer).

The glamorization of Maverick poverty is an ongoing upshot for Saltz, who has turned his lack of wealth into a refrain and trumpets his frugal habit of buying giant bodega coffees to chill overnight, instead of paying a premium for iced coffee. Not to begrudge anyone a long-standing position within an institution, but I'd rather hear about money from the bevy of younger art writers who can merely dream of a staff title or column when a few New York Urban center staff critics have reigned for so long. Recall the joke: What makes a media power couple? Two jobs.

What does it hateful to exist an artist in an economic system that actually doesn't allow many people to brand their living equally artists? The fine art world is in the midst of a larger inflection point at the moment, every bit it increasingly recognizes itself as yet another industry built on hoarded majuscule and exploited labor. The fine art economy has metastasized over the past few decades. Auction houses can sell nearly a billion dollars of art in a weekend; a few mega-galleries are taking over every bit global franchises, supplanting more independent alternatives; and a few superstar artists face force per unit area to expand their studios as quickly every bit possible to run into collector demand, turning into mini-corporations. "Flippers" look to resell hot artists at auction whenever their prices blow up, often damaging their long-term career prospects (since the inflated numbers often prepare expectations also loftier, like an explosive commencement-up). Meanwhile, art workers face the same hardships as everyone else in the cultural economy, competing ferociously for scarce gigs that tend to be temporary.

In that location's a movement against these atmospheric condition. Museum staffs are unionizing, equally at the New Museum. Trustees whose source of wealth appears more than usually morally compromised are existence forced out, similar the Whitney's Warren Kanders, whose company Safariland sells tear-gas grenades. Artists are developing other means of support, selling direct to collectors, using crowdfunding, or launching podcasts. This backdrop goes largely unaddressed in How to Be an Creative person. The book is more concerned with the lifestyle or symbols of fine art-making than with its current reality. Information technology'due south fine to have a family, Saltz tells us, pointing out that the famous artist Laurel Nakadate has a 2-year-former son who loves to paint. Nakadate is unfortunately very much the exception.

The purpose of art here seems to be as entertainment or luxury, a passionate hobby, not a force that actively shapes the style we see our society, what we expect from our lives, and thus the world itself. There'southward a deviation between creative self-expression and actually being an artist, who investigates long-term aesthetic and cultural bug. We can encourage personal inventiveness while withal preserving the importance and difficulty of that latter path. By limiting himself for the nearly part to fine art's formal qualities, Saltz likewise downplays its utility and complexity. "Seeing comes before words," as John Berger wrote in his 1972 landmark Ways of Seeing, which demonstrated that neither making nor consuming art is a politically neutral act. We run into first, instantaneously, simply we however demand strong writing in lodge to form our understanding of fine art'due south enduring purpose and effects.

---

Pushing more people to think more nigh art is an unalloyed adept, whatever form it takes. Merely is it too much to ask for this instructional book, aimed at future art school students and Sun painters, to put forth a holistic theory of art? Maybe it's the paucity of art publishing and the lack of stand-alone books by our few mainstream fine art critics that make me want more than. Or it's that Saltz makes his politics clearer in his criticism. In his New York mag column, he has written on disregarded queer artists and artists of color and the overwhelming influence of money in the art world. He supports projects like the photographer Nan Goldin'due south anti-opioid habit activism on social media. Only here he shies away.

Writing can build sympathy for working artists without encouraging the my-kid-could-practice-that delusion that art is a simple job, or that its private chapters outweighs its public role. That involves a certain amount of education not just on the importance of a studio practice, merely the hierarchy of galleries, dealers, collectors, curators, and museums; the ways in which the economy of the art earth extends far across the artist's grasp; the structural funding of art in some nations and not in others. This information is timely and of import. Albert Camus gave a oral communication in 1957 called "The Artist in His Times" that was recently republished past Vintage in an Consume, Pray, Dear-ish paperback edition retitled Create Dangerously. It's a polemic near the necessity of art in a trying political moment. "Our sole justification, if ane exists, is to speak out, as best we tin, for those who cannot," he writes of artists. "We must all run every risk and work to create freedom."

In chaotic moments, fine art can sometimes serve as a buffer betwixt the cocky and the globe or a method of escapism: "living creatively" every bit an alibi for detachment. Posting photos of your in-progress sketches or ceramics is satisfying. A niggling analog distraction is necessary, a small rebellion against the relentlessly commodified spaces in which we live our lives. Yet nosotros still rely on artists for that larger, more dangerous goal of creating freedom that's not just aesthetic only social and political too. Camus writes: "Freedom in art is worth very footling when it has no significant other than assuring that the creative person has an easy life." That process of cosmos may not look good on television or on Instagram. It's not supposed to.

boothegrapinglies.blogspot.com

Source: https://newrepublic.com/article/157222/jerry-saltz-how-be-artist-instagram-self-help

Share this post